Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I’m not sure I follow why the performance is “Insane”

This is a M5 level chip that runs slightly within a ballpark of M5 wattage (afaik M5 is between 15W max on an iPad and 30W max CPU+GPU on a cooled Mac)

This is running in a thermally unconstrained bench setup and has potentially worse power consumption with what will be lower than previous gen performance when this and the alleged M6 are truly out.



So tired of people on HN calling you out for being excited about tech.

It gets M5-level numbers at 12-14W.

It gets about 30% better perf than the A19 Pro at equal wattage on the whole 4W - 8W range.

So no it's not worse power consumption than prev gen. This is ARM's stock GPU having finally caught up and being competitive with Apple and Qualcomm's mobile GPUs.

This is insane to me. Stay cynical if you want, I have the right to be excited about it.


I’m not trying to say you shouldn’t be excited by it. But there’s a significant number of caveats to every single number you posted but you glossed over the points I made.

And in being defensive, you jumped straight from the topic you were discussing (GPU perf) to CPU perf numbers to try and make a point.

There’s a difference between being cynical and pragmatic, just as there’s a difference between being hyped and realistic.

You haven’t seen this in a product. You’re seeing development board numbers. Be excited all you want but it’s a public forum, if you want to just post without any responses make a blog.


No? The numbers I quoted were GPU numbers, sourced from this video [1].

Also I explicitly acknowledged in my first comment that real devices won't be able to draw that kind of power. But 4 watts is 4 watts whether it's in a test bench or a phone.

[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCCJuOopLK8




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: